Register
My basket£0.00

Journal

All postsMaking & CraftGardening & NatureArt & CultureSlow LivingPeople & PlacesFood & DrinkStudio Club

In Defence of Being a Jack of All Trades

900

When I was fourteen or fifteen I read a magazine article, probably in Cosmopolitan, about finding your signature scent. The advice was to choose one perfume and wear it for the rest of your life. French women did this, apparently, and French women were elegant and grown up and had everything sorted.

I took it to heart. I’m very glad I never followed through. This was the 1980s, the age of Obsession and Poison and big hair. Wear one of those every day for decades, stop being able to smell it on yourself, keep adding more, and eventually people on the Tube will start fainting at your feet.

It was a small thing, but it’s the first time I remember being told that the grown-up way to live was to pick one thing, claim it and stick to it.

Not a sticker

The same idea came back when my friends and I were starting work. Some people had a clear route, into medicine say, and that was them set. Plenty of others tried a job for six months, then another.

They were criticised for it, mostly by parents. “Fourth job in two years. You can tell she’s not a sticker.”

A sensible society would tell a 23-year-old to sample. You’ve no idea whether you like an office or working alone, a team or the general public, until you try. I’d say the first ten years of working life are better spent experimenting than sticking.

Decision fatigue

When I left my job to set up a cut flower business, I read a lot of business books. At the time they were mostly written by American men, and they held up the dotcom entrepreneur who automated everything outside work. Same clothes every day, same food, same gym routine, so no energy was wasted on decisions.

I had two small children and a husband working as a GP, nights included, so the domestic side sat heavily on me. My days were already decision after decision. I wasn’t remotely living in the same world as these people, and yet I read the advice!.

The things I make

The last place it shows up is the one that matters most, and it’s about making.

For the past ten years I’ve taught online, often things I’m not especially expert at. I can teach them well, though. People who have recently learned something still remember where they got stuck, and that makes them good teachers.

But it has always run up against that phrase. I like doing lots of different things, so I must be the “jack of all trades, master of none”.

Seeing everything on our phones has sharpened this. Before, if you wanted to see exquisite needlework, bookbinding or carved spoons, you went to a museum or an exhibition. The setting told you these were made by people who had given their lives to them. Now the same work appears on a screen with nothing to mark it out. So we look at our own wonkily carved spoon and decide we’ve failed, when all we have done is have a go.

What the specialist says no to

When we admire someone who has carved spoons or worked goldwork embroidery for thirty years, we rarely think about what they said no to. Perhaps they didn’t take up knitting, or make a garden, or learn to make pasta. Doing one thing exclusively always means not doing others.

Going broad means saying no to that depth instead. Neither is better. It may be personality, or it may be luck in finding the one thing that holds you for a lifetime.

“Jack” was the bottom of the skill ladder. “Master” is guild language, the person skilled enough to be recognised as a master of their trade. By that measure I’m a jack in plenty of things, and it suits me. I love the curiosity, and I love trying things out.

So if that’s how you’re made, be a Jack or a Jill without apology, and stop measuring your work against what scrolls past on your phone.

And never get a signature scent. What suited you at fifteen won’t suit you at thirty, or sixty, or eighty. If that’s true of perfume, it may well be true of other things.

You may also enjoy …

Comments: 4 (Add)

You must be signed in to post a comment. If you're already a member, please sign in now. If not, you can create an account here.
Deb Bamford

I think I'm the opposite to you - I am an obsessive and I have definitely said " no" to so many things along the way! I don't think either way is right or wrong - certainly not in the present day, but I do think that if you want to learn something to be able to produce a good product it is the skilled teacher you should go to not the person who is currently starting and making the mistakes. If you are having a play at lots of different things then that is a totally different matter. On the subject of perfume, I also thought you were supposed to get yourself a signature perfume - but I've not found 1 yet that I like enough to say "that's me!" - it depends on mood, time of month and oh so many other factors - have lots to choose from, not just 1!!

SnapdragonJane

In reply to Deb Bamford
I’m a serial obsessive- it’s currently crazy patchwork and 1840s knitting books! However I do think that someone who is learning and communicates well is the best teacher- and that may be someone who has been doing something for decades and is open to learning or it may be someone relatively new (not someone who has learned on TikTok- that’s a different argument). I’ve certainly been to some terrible workshops led by amazing textile artists who missed out so many steps because they took them for granted. It could also be that some people are natural teachers and some aren’t. J x
Kathy Depew

This is a very interesting topic! For the last few years I've been trying to "find that One thing" that will occupy all my attention and focus, which I will excel at and love until the day I die. Why haven't I found it? Why do I have so many different creative avenues without time for them all? Not too long ago I realized it is ok to enjoy a variety of creative activities, all at once, here or there, put-off for years and restarted. It is all ok!

This discovery started with a spinning wheel which had been sitting for a few years along with some fleece. I decided to spin with the Tour de Fleece on Ravelry - spin during the Tour de France (ha, ha, spin...) Anyway, my goal was to get back to spinning or decide the wheel could go to another home. It made me feel bad (guilty?) sitting there without being used. Well, I enjoyed, and am continuing to enjoy the spinning. No every day now, but consistently.

During the time spent spinning I thought about my sewing. This is the second part to this realization - I've sewn using a machine since I was about 10. Everyday, no. Would I ever give up my sewing machine -No! It is a part of me. I have a sewing room to use whenever I get the urge. Do I feel guilty about it, No. What bothered me was all the fabric sitting there saying "sew me, sew me, why haven't you sewn me"! It was guilt about unsewn projects, money spent and not put into use. So, if I can sew for more than 50 years, not every day, why does any other creative endeavor need to occupy every day all day?

I tend to jump in with both feet and get everything needed for what ever new project I'm working on or skill I'm learning. This is what needs to be reined-in a bit, not the curiosity and desire to learn new things. Maybe the curiosity and desire to learn are "the things" that I have, and have had, all my life. Hmm, this is a new thought for me and deserves further consideration! Thank you Jane!!

Jen Dun

So interesting and though provoking Jane and humorous! I'm happy to change the word Jack to the much better word of Jill and to continue with all my trades (interests and hobbies), mastering (enjoying) as many as I can. Much of the fun, for me, is in gathering the supplies needed for a new interest, feeling and smelling them, looking at them on the shelf :) I noticed and am fascinated by the crazy quilt you have on your chair Jane .. Hope we get a tour of it.. please :) x

Loading

This site may set cookies for essential tasks, such as tracking whether you are signed in.

We would also like to set analytics cookies to better understand our users’ behaviour.